Safety and tolerability of first-line durvalumab with tremelimumab and chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is associated with poor prognosis; new first-line systemic treatment options are needed. Combining immuno-oncology therapies with standard chemotherapy may represent a promising approach for the treatment of solid tumors. Results from a Phase Ib study evaluating durvalumab with tremelimumab and chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC are reported. METHODS: Adults with advanced or metastatic ESCC who were candidates for first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received durvalumab 1500 mg (Day 1), tremelimumab 75 mg (Day 1), cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (Day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 800 mg/m2 (Days 1-5) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or discontinuation due to toxicity. The study consisted of safety run-in (Part A) and expansion (Part B) periods. The primary endpoint was safety. Antitumor activity was an exploratory endpoint. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled, 6 in Part A and 10 in Part B, and received a median of 4.0 treatment cycles. All patients were Asian; median age was 65.0 years. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs) related to cisplatin and 5-FU, and 8 (50.0%) patients experienced AEs related to durvalumab and tremelimumab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 7 (43.8%) patients. There were no deaths associated with AEs. Six (37.5%) patients achieved an objective response. Median progression-free survival was 3.75 months, and median overall survival was 9.69 months. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab with tremelimumab and chemotherapy demonstrated manageable safety and antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, warranting further investigation in randomized trials. Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02658214.

Tumor Mutational Burden as a Predictor of Survival with Durvalumab and/or Tremelimumab Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Biomarkers that predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) are needed. This retrospective study assessed tumor mutational burden (TMB) and outcomes in the phase II HAWK and CONDOR and phase III EAGLE studies of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in platinum-resistant R/M HNSCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor samples from HAWK/CONDOR (N = 153) and blood samples from EAGLE (N = 247) were analyzed for TMB. Associations with survival were evaluated for tissue TMB (tTMB) at cutoffs from 10 to 20 mutations/megabase (mut/Mb) and for blood plasma TMB (bTMB) at cutoffs from 8 to 24 mut/Mb. RESULTS: In HAWK/CONDOR, overall survival (OS) with durvalumab with or without tremelimumab was longer for high versus low tTMB: statistically significant differences were observed with durvalumab plus tremelimumab at tTMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb [HR, 0.52 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.28-0.98)] and tTMB ≥ 12 mut/Mb [HR, 0.46 (95% CI, 0.24-0.86)]. In EAGLE, a significant OS benefit versus chemotherapy was observed with durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab at bTMB≥16 mut/Mb [HR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.20-0.76) and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19-0.78), respectively] but not bTMB < 16 mut/Mb [HR, 0.92 (0.61-1.37) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.62-1.36), respectively]. A significant progression-free survival benefit was also observed in the ICI arms versus chemotherapy at bTMB ≥ 16 mut/Mb. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support TMB as a biomarker for predicting survival in patients with platinum-resistant R/M HNSCC treated with ICIs. The analysis of EAGLE demonstrated that bTMB was predictive of survival with ICI treatment versus chemotherapy in a large, randomized controlled study population.

Association of circulating protein biomarkers with clinical outcomes of durvalumab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

The potential for durvalumab, a programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-blocking monoclonal antibody, to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is being evaluated in multiple clinical trials. We assessed circulating proteins at baseline to identify potential biomarkers and to understand pathways related to clinical outcomes for durvalumab. Prior to treatment, 66 serum proteins were measured using multiplex immunoassays for 158 durvalumab-treated HNSCC patients in the phase II HAWK and CONDOR trials as a discovery dataset and 209 durvalumab-treated HNSCC patients in the phase III EAGLE trial as a validation dataset. Multivariate Cox modeling of HAWK and CONDOR datasets established that higher baseline concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein, S100 calcium-binding protein A12, and angiopoietin-2 (ANGPT2) were associated with shorter overall survival (OS), while higher concentrations of osteocalcin correlated with longer OS after durvalumab treatment (p < .05). All five proteins remained significantly correlated with OS after adjusting for baseline clinical factors, with consistent results across clinical efficacy endpoints based on univariate correlation analyses. The validation dataset from the EAGLE trial confirmed the independent association of IL-6 and osteocalcin with OS, and preserved directional trends for the other biomarkers identified in the discovery dataset. Our results demonstrate the important role of immunosuppressive proteins in the resistance of HNSCC to durvalumab treatment. Osteocalcin showed a positive correlation with clinical outcomes, which remains to be further investigated.

Curative-Intent Treatment with Durvalumab in Early-Stage Cancers.

The introduction of immunotherapy has fundamentally transformed the treatment landscape in cancer, providing long-term survival benefit for patients with advanced disease across multiple tumor types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the placebo-controlled phase 3 PACIFIC trial, the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC who had not progressed after platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). These findings have led to the widespread acceptance of the 'PACIFIC regimen' (durvalumab after CRT) as the standard of care in this setting. Moreover, the PACIFIC trial is the first study to demonstrate a proven survival advantage with an immunotherapy in a curative-intent setting, thereby providing a strong rationale for further investigation of durvalumab in early-stage cancers. Herein, we describe the extensive clinical development program for durvalumab across multiple tumor types in curative-intent settings, outlining the scientific rationale(s) for its use and highlighting the innovative research (e.g., personalized cancer monitoring) advanced by these trials.

Activity and safety of ceritinib in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-1): updated results from the multicentre, open-label, phase 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is sensitive to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK inhibitors) such as crizotinib, but resistance invariably develops, often with progression in the brain. Ceritinib is a more potent ALK inhibitor than crizotinib in vitro, crosses the blood-brain barrier in vivo, and shows clinical responses in patients with crizotinib-resistant disease. We aimed to assess whole-body activity of ceritinib in both ALK inhibitor-pretreated and ALK inhibitor-naive patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC. METHODS: ASCEND-1 was an open-label, phase 1 trial that recruited patients from 20 academic hospitals or cancer centres in 11 countries in Europe, North America, and Asia-Pacific. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with ALK-rearranged locally advanced or metastatic cancer that had progressed despite standard therapy (or for which no effective standard therapy existed), who had at least one measurable lesion at baseline. The primary objective (to determine the maximum tolerated dose) has been reported previously. This updated analysis includes all patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC given oral ceritinib at the recommended dose of 750 mg/day in the dose-escalation and expansion phases. Here we report the secondary outcomes of overall response, duration of response, and progression-free survival, analysed in all patients who received at least one 750 mg dose of ceritinib. Exploratory analyses included retrospective analysis of intracranial activity by independent neuroradiologists, in patients with untreated or locally treated neurologically stable brain metastases at baseline. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of ceritinib. This study is no longer recruiting patients; however, treatment and follow-up are ongoing. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01283516. FINDINGS: Between Jan 24, 2011, and July 31, 2013, 255 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of ceritinib 750 mg/day, of whom 246 had ALK-rearranged NSCLC. At data cutoff (April 14, 2014), median follow-up was 11·1 months (IQR 6·7-15·2) and 147 (60%) patients had discontinued treatment, 98 (40%) as a result of disease progression. An overall response was reported in 60 (72% [95% CI 61-82]) of 83 ALK inhibitor-naive patients and 92 (56% [49-64]) of 163 ALK inhibitor-pretreated patients. Median duration of response was 17·0 months (95% CI 11·3-non-estimable [NE]) in ALK inhibitor-naive patients and 8·3 months (6·8-9·7) in ALK inhibitor-pretreated patients. Median progression-free survival was 18·4 months (95% CI 11·1-NE) in ALK inhibitor-naive patients and 6·9 months (5·6-8·7) in ALK inhibitor-pretreated patients. Of 94 patients with retrospectively confirmed brain metastases and at least one post-baseline MRI or CT tumour assessment, intracranial disease control was reported in 15 (79% [95% CI 54-94]) of 19 ALK inhibitor-naive patients and in 49 (65% [54-76]) of 75 ALK inhibitor-pretreated patients. Of these 94 patients, 11 had measurable brain lesions and no previous radiotherapy to the brain, six of whom achieved a partial intracranial response. Serious adverse events were recorded in 117 (48%) of 246 patients. The most common grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities were increased alanine aminotransferase (73 [30%] patients) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (25 [10%]). The most common grade 3-4 non-laboratory adverse events were diarrhoea and nausea, both of which occurred in 15 (6%) patients. Two on-treatment deaths during the study were deemed to be related to study drug by the investigators, one due to interstitial lung disease and one as a result of multiorgan failure that occurred in the context of infection and ischaemic hepatitis. INTERPRETATION: The durable whole-body responses reported, together with the intracranial activity, support a clinical benefit for treatment with ceritinib in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who have received crizotinib, or as an alternative to crizotinib. A confirmatory phase 2 clinical trial is ongoing to assess ceritinib activity in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC and brain or leptomeningeal metastases. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Targeting FGFR with dovitinib (TKI258): preclinical and clinical data in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) and FGFR2 amplifications are observed in approximately 10% of breast cancers and are related to poor outcomes. We evaluated whether dovitinib (TKI258), an inhibitor of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3, presented antitumor activity in FGFR-amplified breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Preclinical activity of dovitinib was evaluated in both breast cancer cell lines and an FGFR1-amplified xenograft model (HBCx2). Dovitinib was then evaluated in a phase II trial that included 4 groups of patients with human EGF receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer on the basis of FGFR1 amplification and hormone receptor (HR) status. FGFR1 amplification was assessed by silver in situ hybridization. Preplanned retrospective analyses assessed predictive value of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGF3 amplifications by quantitative PCR (qPCR). RESULTS: Dovitinib monotherapy inhibits proliferation in FGFR1- and FGFR2-amplified, but not FGFR-normal, breast cancer cell lines. Dovitinib also inhibits tumor growth in FGFR1-amplified breast cancer xenografts. Eighty-one patients were enrolled in the trial. Unconfirmed response or stable disease for more than 6 months was observed in 5 (25%) and 1 (3%) patient(s) with FGFR1-amplified/HR-positive and FGFR1-nonamplified/HR-positive breast cancer. When qPCR-identified amplifications in FGFR1, FGFR2, or FGF3 were grouped to define an FGF pathway-amplified breast cancer in HR-positive patients, the mean reduction in target lesions was 21.1% compared with a 12.0% increase in patients who did not present with FGF pathway-amplified breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Dovitinib showed antitumor activity in FGFR-amplified breast cancer cell lines and may have activity in breast cancers with FGF pathway amplification.

Activity of the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors dovitinib (TKI258) and NVP-BGJ398 in human endometrial cancer cells.

The recent identification of activating fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) mutations in endometrial cancer has generated an opportunity for a novel target-based therapy. Here, we explore the therapeutic potential of 2 FGFR inhibitors, the multikinase inhibitor dovitinib (TKI258) and the more selective FGFR inhibitor NVP-BGJ398 for the treatment of endometrial cancer. We examined the effects of both inhibitors on tumor cell growth, FGFR2 signaling, cell cycle, and apoptosis using a panel of 20 molecularly characterized human endometrial cancer cell lines. Anchorage-independent growth was studied using soft agar assays. In vivo studies were conducted using endometrial cancer xenograft models. Cell lines with activating FGFR2 mutations (S252W, N550K) were more sensitive to dovitinib or NVP-BGJ398 when compared with their FGFR2 wild-type counterparts (P = 0.073 and P = 0.021, respectively). Both agents inhibited FGFR2 signaling, induced cell-cycle arrest, and significantly increased apoptosis in FGFR2-mutant lines. In vitro, dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 were both potent at inhibiting cell growth of FGFR2-mutant endometrial cancer cells, but the activity of dovitinib was less restricted to FGFR2-mutant lines when compared with NVP-BGJ398. In vivo, dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 significantly inhibited the growth of FGFR2-mutated endometrial cancer xenograft models. In addition, dovitinib showed significant antitumor activity in FGFR2 wild-type endometrial cancer xenograft models including complete tumor regressions in a long-term in vivo study. Dovitinib and NVP-BGJ398 warrant further clinical evaluation in patients with FGFR2-mutated endometrial cancer. Dovitinib may have antitumor activity in endometrial cancer beyond FGFR2-mutated cases and may permit greater flexibility in patient selection.

A retrospective pooled analysis of trabectedin safety in 1,132 patients with solid tumors treated in phase II clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To summarize the safety experience obtained from phase II clinical trials conducted with trabectedin as single-agent therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: This retrospective analysis includes 1,132 patients exposed to trabectedin in 19 phase II trials carried out between February 1999 and April 2008. Trabectedin was administered intravenously as 1 of 3 schedules: 24-hour infusion every 3 weeks (q3wk 24-h; n = 570/2,818 cycles), 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks (q3wk 3-h; n = 258/1,003 cycles), and 3-hour infusion for three consecutive weeks every 4 weeks (qwk 3-h; n = 304/1,198 cycles). RESULTS: The majority of patients (90%) had received previous chemotherapy. Patients were given a median of three treatment cycles of trabectedin (range, 1-59). Nausea, fatigue and vomiting were the most common trabectedin-related adverse events, reported in ≥20% of patients. Reversible myelosuppression (mainly neutropenia) and transient reversible transaminase increases were the most common laboratory abnormalities seen with trabectedin, with a very low incidence of relevant clinical consequences. Deaths associated with drug-related adverse events were infrequent, occurring in 19 (1.7%) patients. CONCLUSION: Single-agent trabectedin treatment was reasonably well tolerated. Trabectedin can be administered for prolonged periods to patients with sustained clinical benefit (induction of disease stability or shrinkage) without cumulative toxicities over time.

Phase I study of weekly plitidepsin as 1-hour infusion combined with carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas.

This dose-escalating phase I clinical trial was designed to determine the recommended dose (RD) and to assess the safety and feasibility of weekly plitidepsin (1-hour i.v. infusion, Days 1, 8 and 15) combined with carboplatin (1-hour i.v. infusion, Day 1, after plitidepsin) in 4-week (q4wk) cycles given to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphomas. Twenty patients were enrolled and evaluable for both safety and efficacy. The starting dose was plitidepsin 1.8 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) = 5 min*mg/ml; dose escalation proceeded based on worst toxicity in the previous cohort. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was plitidepsin 3.0 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 5 min*mg/ml, with grade 3 transaminase increases as the most common dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). The RD for phase II studies was plitidepsin 2.4 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 5 min*mg/ml, with fatigue, myalgia and nausea as the most common drug-related adverse events (AEs). No unexpected toxicity was seen. Twelve patients (60%), ten of whom were heavily pretreated (≥2 previous chemotherapy lines) showed stable disease (SD), with a median time to progression (TTP) of 4.4 months. In conclusion, plitidepsin 2.4 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 5 min*mg/ml is a safe dose for future phase II studies evaluating the use of this combination in cancer patients potentially sensitive to platinum-based therapy.

QTc monitoring during a phase I study: experience with SR271425.

OBJECTIVE: SR271425 is a thioxanthone cytotoxic drug that induces dose-related cardiac electrophysiologic changes in preclinical models. A phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximally tolerated dose and safety profile, notably cardiac events. METHODS: SR271425 was administered weekly as a 2-hour single intravenous infusion with a fixed 30 mg/m2 increment at each dose level (DL). A sustained cardiac evaluation was performed. ECG parameters were evaluated at bedside by an investigator or a cardiologist, as well as by central reading for dose limiting toxicity (DLT) determination. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were treated. Five DLs were explored, from 75 mg/m2/wk to 195 mg/m2/wk. Fourteen patients (87.5%) experienced noncardiac adverse events related to treatment; only 2 patients presented grade 3 toxicity (nausea/vomiting and GGT increase) and no grade 4 toxicities were reported. Asymptomatic grade 1 or 2 QTcF prolongations were observed in 5 patients during central readings, and in 4 cases at bedside. One QTc-DLT, registered at bedside (grade 2), was unconfirmed at central reading, while another QTc-DLT, not noted at bedside, was highlighted by central reading. No arrhythmias or QRS prolongations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose of SR271425 was not reached in this trial due to early termination of the trial, not related to cardiac toxicity, following the termination of the development program by the sponsor. Sustained ECG monitoring is quite feasible in oncology phase I trials, but discrepancies between bedside and central evaluation could lead to conflicting decisions for management of patient care.

A phase II study of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil combination in patients with anthracycline-pretreated and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine/5-fluorouracil (FON) combination in anthracycline and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. The following treatment was given: on day 1 of a 21-day cycle, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m (2-h intravenous infusion); on days 1 and 5, vinorelbine [dose level (DL) 1: 17.5 mg/m; DL2: 22 mg/m]; on days 1-5, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (DL1: 600 mg/m/day; DL2: 750 mg/m/day). Forty-seven patients were treated (DL1: 43; DL2: 4). Median age was 54 years; 68% had liver metastases, 53% were taxane refractory/resistant and 38% were anthracycline refractory/resistant. Patients received a median of six treatment cycles. Of 46 eligible patients, 16 had partial response; the overall response rate was 34.8% (95% confidence interval 21.3-50.3%), 11 had stable disease lasting more than 4 months. Median follow-up was 13.0 months, median time to progression 5.7 months and estimated overall survival 18.8 months. DL2 was too toxic with three patients having grade 3-4 toxicity, including one death. At DL1, 26 patients (60%) experienced grade 3-4 neutropenia (six febrile neutropenia) and eight had grade 3 oxaliplatin-specific peripheral neuropathy after a median of 646.4 mg/m oxaliplatin (range 124-1619 mg/m). Oxaliplatin (130 mg/m, day 1)/vinorelbine (17.5 mg/m, days 1,5)/5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m/day, days 1-5) demonstrate encouraging activity and a manageable safety profile in anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

Phase II study of an oxaliplatin/vinorelbine combination in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pre-treated metastatic breast cancer.

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an oxaliplatin (OXA)/vinorelbine (VNB) combination in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients pre-treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients received OXA at 130 mg/m (2-h i.v.), day 1, and VNB days 1 and 8 at 24-26 mg/m repeated every 3 weeks. Forty-two patients (median age 54; 64% with liver metastasis, 67% taxane resistant/refractory and 38% anthracycline resistant/refractory) were treated. A median of 4 cycles of treatment was given per patient, with 31% receiving 6 or more. Eleven partial responses and 16 patients with stable disease (five lasting more than 4 months) in 41 eligible patients were seen, for an overall response rate of 26.8% (95% confidence interval 14.2-42.9). Median follow-up was 15.9 months (7.2-30.6), median time to progression was 3.4 months and estimated overall survival was 12.7 months (20 events). Thirty-three patients experienced (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2) grade 3-4 neutropenia (one case of febrile neutropenia) and three patients had severe constipation requiring hospitalization. Nine patients developed grade 3 OXA-specific neurotoxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. We conclude that OXA 130 mg/m (day 1) and VNB 24 mg/m (day 1 and 8) combination given every 3 weeks is effective with a good safety profile in MBC patients previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven administered weekly or biweekly in advanced solid tumor patients.

PURPOSE: We performed a Phase I and pharmacokinetic study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irofulven (6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene; MGI-114, MGI PHARMA, Inc.), administered in intermittent weekly schedules in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Three schedules were tested: A, days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks; B, days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; C, days 1 and 15 every 4 weeks. Drugs were administered as 5- and 30-min (schedules B and C) infusions. Dose levels of 10, 12, and 14 mg/m(2)/week were explored. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients received 256 cycles. Fifteen of 74 patients evaluable for maximum tolerated dose experienced 16 dose-limiting toxicities (5 of 17 patients on schedule A, 2 of 25 on schedule B, and 8 of 32 on schedule C), principally treatment delay for thrombocytopenia. Schedule A was considered unsuitable because of frequent thrombocytopenia and treatment discontinuations. Twenty-three percent of the overall population (22 patients with grade 1-2, and 1 patient with grade 3), including 37% of patients on dose level 3, experienced unexpected dose-limiting visual toxicity, which included color perception and visual field alterations linked to retinal cone cell toxicity; the visual toxicity had an early onset, was mostly reversible, and was related to higher dose per infusion. Safety profiles were similar for 5- and 30-min infusions. The relationships between dose and area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration were linear for both 5- and 30-min infusions in the 78 patients evaluated for pharmacokinetics. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve and clearance were comparable between infusion durations. Responses included one complete (ovarian), one partial (renal), and seven disease stabilizations lasting >4 months. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend doses of 18 mg/m(2)/infusion for schedule B and 24 mg/m(2)/infusion for schedule C, limited to 0.55 mg/kg and a total dose of 50 mg/infusion, administered over 30-min.